Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Games Entertainment

The Aging Gamer 295

An anonymous reader writes "There is a short article at the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle about the surprising statistic that a large potion of computer gamers are over 35. This actually makes sense, since many of them began gaming in the 70's. A short and semi-interesting read."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Aging Gamer

Comments Filter:
  • by wadetemp ( 217315 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @09:42PM (#4429103)
    Please refrain from from posting semi-interesting comments lest this entire thread become only semi-interesting.
  • Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @09:44PM (#4429116)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • pfft cramps (Score:4, Funny)

      by waspleg ( 316038 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @09:56PM (#4429179) Journal
      men use bandaids and soldier onward princess zelda needs our attentions and school can only stay shut down from sheets of ice for so long..

      that's when games focused on playability (read: FUN) rather than flashy (8 bits, mmm) graphics

    • by altairmaine ( 317424 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:13PM (#4429270)
      > That is quite scary, considering that gaming is at an all time high right now...so, if in 20 years
      > 90+% of gamers are over 35, i wouldn't be shocked....

      Ummmm. That really doesn't make any sense. The birth rate isn't plummetting catastrophically. I teach high school - and I assure you that a large fraction of the 14-year-olds on down are quite hooked. They'll be 34 in 20 years, and I don't see any likely reason that gaming would stop gaining recruits. 10 or so to 35 is an awfully big fraction of the population, much more than 10% - even if they WERE underrepresented in the gaming group, they'd claim more than 10% of it. And I see such an underrepresentation as unlikely. A higher fraction of today's youth are gamers, for instance, than were gamers in the 70s.
    • by ackthpt ( 218170 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:46PM (#4429405) Homepage Journal
      Mario? Geez, that's, like NEW!

      I started playing games on a model 33 Teletype. Then we got an OSI 540 board going and I played Tiger Tank 'til the wee hours. And Wumpus and all matter of things, before discovering $DUNGEO (many refer to this as Zork) and $ADVENT (Colossal Cave), both brought back on a tape from a DECUS. Then there were many others written by students, before the first Apple Lab opened on campus and color was introduced. Eventually arcades sprung up at the mall, where Mario lept over barrels to rescue a princess.

      Aging gamers? Well, there's aging games, too, which many call AbandonWare (and many a site dedicated to the nobel cause of keeping these things alive, while EA keeps recreating the same themes over and over...)

      It's really a question of what a generation does with its leisure time. Mine spent it gaming. The current one does, too. It's rather hard to imagine future generations not doing it (unless everyone suddenly falls for some absurd cult. [xenu.net]

  • by bravehamster ( 44836 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @09:45PM (#4429122) Homepage Journal
    In another surprising study, the same thing was found to be true of Britney Spears fans.

  • by Maddog_Delphi97 ( 173780 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @09:45PM (#4429126)
    "A short and semi-interesting read."

    That's good, because most of us gamers are also short and semi-interesting as well...
  • Another anonymous reader points out a not-so-suprising statistic: 92.4% of /. editors failed elemtary spelling exams.
    • by Jerf ( 17166 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @11:02PM (#4429484) Journal
      The smallest fraction with integral dividend and divisor that produces .924 is 231/250. (3*7*11 / 5*5*5*2)

      Empirical observation suggests that your implicit claim that there are 19 (250-231) Slashdot editors that can spell is false, unless you can produce 19 such editors. (Difficult, since the entire universe of discourse is what, six people?)

      I suspect something has gone wonky with your math, and suggest you correct it posthaste. Alternatively, you can clarify what you mean by a fractional editor.

      For the humorless, :-)
  • by pleclair ( 608155 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @09:46PM (#4429129) Homepage
    I would be more interested in seeing how many of these people are unmarried ... or divorced as a direct result of gaming
    • by DoctorPepper ( 92269 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:14PM (#4429274)
      I'm currently 43 and on my second marriage. My first marriage ended in divorce, not because of gaming, but becuase of hacking. I would practically lock myself in the room with my computer and write code on the weekends. Boy was I stupid back then! Now I just don't lock the door :-)
      • by aebrain ( 184502 ) <aebrain@gmail.com> on Friday October 11, 2002 @01:44AM (#4430069) Homepage Journal
        I'm currently 43 and on my second marriage.
        44 and still on my first - and we've just had our first child, after 20 years of wedded blitz.

        Started programming at age 9 back in 1967, and the first computer game I played was on an IBM-360 back in 72. Star Trek, no less. First game I ever programmed was on an HP-65 programmable calculator a few years later.

        So my advice is - don't think you'll be "old" in 2030. Save up some good stories about how the Net used to be free, how 2 GigaHz was a fast machine, how we only dreamed of having a Petabyte of main memory on our machine - which was on a desk, not wearable/implanted.

    • by Life2Short ( 593815 ) on Friday October 11, 2002 @12:14AM (#4429757)
      Well I'm 39 and single. Got my first Atari at the tender age of 12-13, back when they were Sears' Video Arcades. I can recall one girlfriend that my "hobby" cost me particularly clearly. I met her while I was living in London. I guess I wasn't spending enough time with her, because one night after work she called me over to a crowded pub near our workplace (she'd been there drinking since about 3pm). She proceeded to pick a fight with me and in the middle of this crowded bar she yells, "YOU WOULD RATHER PLAY WITH YOUR STUPID COMPUTER THAN HAVE SEX WITH ME!!!" Things got very quiet in the pub very fast. Actually, it wasn't really fair. What she said was only true PART of the time.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 10, 2002 @09:47PM (#4429136)
    If I were born earlier, but I'm just too young to qualify.
  • Linux Games (Score:4, Funny)

    by billd ( 11997 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @09:48PM (#4429141) Journal
    I'm getting pretty good at Frozen Bubble & I'm way over 35 (hey, it happens)

    My son however is a better example of an avid gamer. He's been playing Starcraft solidly for the past 2 weeks (school hols) including several overniters.

    Seems a bit excessive to me, but then, I'm not addicted

    ... to gaming that is... Beer on the other hand...

  • perhaps if the average age of gamers keeps rising, there will eventually be a bigger gamer "death" rate than "birth" rate?

    I'm scared to think of what would happen. heh.
  • by Quino ( 613400 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @09:50PM (#4429148)
    I used to (somewhat apologetically) explain to people that I had spent last friday night playing GTA3 (I'm 28). I used to think I was a loser, but it's nice to know I'm part of a larger demographic! :) Then again, this doesn't necessarily mean I'm not a loser, just not the only one!
    • Fight the societal norm! The real losers are the ones who *don't* stay in playing GTA3 on friday nights! (Or at least, the ones who feel the need to make fun of people who do.)
      • Your sig (Score:5, Informative)

        by diaphanous ( 1806 ) <pgarland@gma i l . com> on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:14PM (#4429272)

        "REAL geeks think that Y2K happens in the year 2048."

        Don't you mean 2038? Assuming of course, that you are referring to the problems that may occur in 2038 when the number of seconds since the beginning of the UNIX epoch will overflow 32 bit integers.

        ~Phillip

        • It got me too the first time - it was the first problem year that popped into my head and I just figured - eh - probably got a digit wrong.

          But as the other respondents say, there's a more basic answer. I guess I'm just getting ahead of myself envisioning the truckloads of cash I'll be collecting from my steady investment in short-term thinking.

          And hey - have we planted the seeds to build the trust funds for the children of the poor techies in 2050 who missed the train? We should start thinking about that now - wouldn't want to wait to the last second...bwaahahahaha!
    • nah fuck the apologising bit, if there is one thing that shits me more than anything else its the old games == losers line that is so frequently put forward.

      people will spend all friday night watching teevee instead of going out and thats apparently fine, but as soon as you turn on the computer you are a big time loser ...

      if it makes you feel any better, from last sunday morning thru to monday night i was on the comp playing games. and my g/f, who works weekends a lot, is working both days this weekend, so im up for more of the same ... and im 25 ... ill be playing games until i cant play em no more.

      anyone who feels the need to deride someone else for their choice of hobby is really the one that needs the life, not you :)
      • Yep, agreed!

        I recently turned 31 myself, and last Xmas, I bought myself a PS2 and several games for it. Granted, I was always a bit selective about what I purchased/played. There seem to be quite a few "teenie-bopper" games out there that don't do anything for me.

        But how can you place an "age limit" on sports games, billiards games, flight simulators, well-done car racing sims, and any games with "mature" themes + good graphics, sound, and all around gameplay (like GTA3 for example)?

        As a matter of fact, one of the guys I worked with who was a few years older than me got hooked on PS2 after I kept telling him about the stuff available for it. (Initially, he wrote it off as kid stuff - but his interest was piqued when he heard about Gran Turismo 3 and the like.) I think he bought one "for his kid" as an excuse, and ended up playing it himself.

        In fact, I think one of society's big problems today is the number of folks who live in relative boredom and depression because of a self-inflicted lack of fun/hobbies. There's this prevelant sense that as you reach age 30 or so, you're "not supposed" to do lots of stuff anymore. (No more big car stereo upgrades.... no more video games.... yadda, yadda.) Screw that. I never want to grow old and be one of the "statistics" that sits around drinking beer in front of the TV, watching only football, baseball and/or hockey - goes to work, eats, and sleeps, and never really does anything else "for the fun of it".
  • by lute3 ( 72400 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @09:51PM (#4429153) Homepage Journal
    Currently we have phones with small games in them.

    With the technology available when these 35-year-olds are 70, they'll be able to have fully immersive games embedded in their walkers.

  • Sounds like me... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by eaddict ( 148006 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @09:52PM (#4429158)
    Now that I am over 35 (egad! Going to hit 28h soon!) I can actually afford the games. The ones I buy would have been a heck of a lot of allowance or lawns in my day. In fact, I think this age thing also has to do with the fact that games are much better than they used to be too - from a hardware and software point. When I first started out there wasn't much available for my $3500 Leading Edge...
    • This is what Sony figured out, and why the Playstation was such a success. It was the first console to have a real plethora of adult oriented games. Well Sony discovered two things as a result of this:

      1) There are lots of adults that want to play games.
      2) Adults have more money.

      Kids have to take whatever their parents will give them, adults can spend what they wish within the limits of their means. Unsupprisingly, this means that adults spend more on games.
  • by Anenga ( 529854 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @09:52PM (#4429160)
    What popular games were out on the PC platform in the 70's? Perhaps they're talking about Super Mario or Pacman?

    Does this same age group dominate the console market too? If so, then perhaps Nintendo and Playstation should change their target demographics. Stop selling games with "FREE Bike Decals!" and replace it with "FREE Car Insurance Estimate!"
    • I don't know about the 70's but the 80's (C64!!) had Mario Bros and pacman on the PC
    • Seriously?

      Star Trek (variants). I learned Linear Algebra working out how to move my ship around hyper-space on the Star Trek game a friend and I wrote on our TRS-80 model 1.

      Lemonade Stand on the Apple II+.

      There was a stock market sort of game that came standard with the Comodore Pet.

      Wumpus was big on the Kim MOE-1 (but you had to enter the code each time you wanted to play - we didn't have the cassette tape interface.)

      My favorite game was a Dungeons and Dragons game that I got the majority of the code from out of an article in Byte. We hacked the code up into a fun little game. I remember missing a date with my girlfriend - later my wife - because I was so excited about showing some friends a new monster and attack that I had coded.
    • There were no PC's in the 70s if you mean IBM (introduced in 1981) or any clone of which we have the children of today. We had some great games on mainframes though. They were all text based and even some were multi-user. The geeks were nerds then and could be found in the engineering depts at universities staying up late at night basking in the eerie glow of a ancient monochrome CRT monitor or the annoying noise of a paper fed TTY terminal. Those were the days.

    • I remember My first computer Apple II in 1980. There weren't ANY games you could buy. But, however, there were BOOKS with games and programs with the code printed in BASIC. You had to copy the program out of the book and then save it to a crappy radioshack tape player.. Remember listening to the start of a program...BRAAAA....BRAAAABOOOSCCRRRR!
      I also remember some of the code used "A" in IF THEN statements and the computers generating errors from that ERROR line 10 IF AT HEN goto line 100

      But I could write my own "game" in an afternoon.
  • by 0ddity ( 169788 ) <jam1000_77@yahoo.com> on Thursday October 10, 2002 @09:54PM (#4429168)
    I am sure everyone knows what "Nintendo Thumb" is. Playing so long that you form blisters on top of blisters.

    What kind of health hazards do we need to watch out for in the future.

    Chronic arthritis of the thumbs is one thing but what happens when we all start gaming in VR?

  • by Capsaicin ( 412918 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @09:54PM (#4429170)

    Unbelievable, they have been playing computer games for over 20 years and it hasn't killed them yet?

    • Yeah, that poor wuss who was playing for only 86 hours, in Korea, died just the other day. Makes you wonder where these gamers get their stamina from? Powerups? Did they find secret locations that have eluded the rest of us? Are they just camping?
    • Silly person -- you don't die until you stop gaming and head to the bathroom. Don't go!
    • No, but they're probably stone-cold killers one and all. After all, computer gaming trains you to be a killer, it's like murder simulators.

      I'm gonna go watch some Kung-Fu movies since they'll turn my fat ass into a lean fighting machine...

    • Unbelievable, they have been playing computer games for over 20 years and it hasn't killed them yet?

      It's weird. I thought they should be out on the street killing people or imprisoned for life. Isn't that what happens from computer games?
  • by w1r3sp33d ( 593084 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @09:59PM (#4429196)
    I played pong when it was bleeding edge technology, why wouldn't I be excited about the great advances in games over the last several years or be looking forward to some of the new games coming out in 2003? I am part of a generation of kids who have had every system between the Atari 2600 and the Xbox, I would think that our consumer dollars would be very strong in this market. I just don't understand this being a surprise to anyone.
    • Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)

      by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:53PM (#4429437)
      Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • Games aren't really getting any worse, you're just losing the thrill of them being 'new'. Many folks in their 30s found Nintendo games to be of very poor quality, because they grew up playing on their Atari. Everyone goes through a phase where for a time, all new games really seem to suck. Eventually, most of us come back.

        Me, I got sick of console games right around the Playstation. 7 years later, I'm back full swing, enjoying the hell out of my Gamecube.

        And for the naysayers who want to talk about how all new games are the same, and boring.... you're not saying anything new. 90% of what came out for the NES was complete crap. Same for every system since. Finding the gems is what makes it all worth while.
      • Why would anyone quit gaming?

        Because games get stale after a while, especially with most games pigeonholed into cliche-ridden genres: FPS, RTS, "character with attitude" platformer, racing, fighting, RPG. What eventually started bugging me is that most games are designed to take X hours to "beat." You buy the game, you plow through it, you see all the movies and all the levels and get the same experience out of it that everyone else does, and then you're done. So not only do you need a huge block of time to play, but you're just following a script. The cry for story-based games has made this much worse than it used to be.

        What I really want is to sit down for short bursts and play something unique. But instead it's like going to a video store that only rents movies like Collateral Damage and The Phantom Menace (ugh!), except that they're each 15 hours long.
  • It's simple for me (Score:5, Insightful)

    by futuresheep ( 531366 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:00PM (#4429198) Journal
    I still like playing them, and while game prices have stayed the same over the last ten years, my income has risen dramatically. In other words...It's easier for me to pay to play!
  • by puto ( 533470 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:01PM (#4429201) Homepage
    Ok I am 32 years old. Here is what I played. Wasn't no Sega or Nintendo in my day.

    Pinball - Silverball Mania
    Pong - Cocktal Version, lost many a quarter(but pops snuck me into bars, cause that is where pong lived.

    Boot Hill - FPS? The Original death match.

    What about those wierd baseball games where you hat to bat at the balls with the stick on a lever?

    Shoot the bear with the 90 pound rifle?

    Then came the 2600 for me. I can play Combat by myself for hours.

    Breakout? You kicked its ass enough the bricks didnt come back.

    AS for being in the thirties. I still latch on too the odd game(gotta keep the kiddies in check cause I can't impress em with my cool Galaga skills).

    Now I am playing The Thing. Not so bad, the character barf and commit suicide.

    Puto
  • we have the $$$ (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward
    We are the only ones that can afford state of the art computers, graphics cards, monitors, and cdroms.. :)
  • In my case (Score:3, Interesting)

    by djupedal ( 584558 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:03PM (#4429218)
    While my kids interest grew to every platform in the catalog, I gradually got away from games altogether, except to check in on what I determined was the bleeding edge....I would try my hand once or twice a year just to see how the graphics, as an example, were advancing.

    Later, I decided that editing tech docs for a living was limiting my scope. I felt I was locked into one way of using a computer (or console) and that could not be good. I bought my own PS1 and several car racing titles just to do something different with a processor and display and how my mind was relating. I figure as long as this is how I earn my living, it doesn't hurt to exercise hand-to-eye coordination in the interest of keeping things (mentally) limber.

    Yes, I remember spending hours playing PONG and Parsec. Things have come a long way, and my kids are much more into it than I am, but I still find GT3 a great way to waste an afternoon.
  • Thanks.... (Score:4, Funny)

    by fluxrad ( 125130 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:07PM (#4429240)
    ...the surprising statistic that a large potion of computer gamers...

    LAN Party in a bottle?
  • Voodoo Mathematics (Score:5, Insightful)

    by greenhide ( 597777 ) <`moc.ylkeewellivc' `ta' `todhsalsnadroj'> on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:12PM (#4429266)
    This actually makes sense, since many of them began gaming in the 70's.

    Right, this makes sense. If you are 35 and you are gaming, you must have been doing so your entire lifetime.

    How about this instead: Someone who is 35 now was in their mid teens when arcade games were really big in the mid eighties. They started playing the games non-stop. Most of them did not play on computers at home, they went out to an arcade.

    Fast forward ten to fifteen years. Home game consoles are so cheap and so powerful that they're better than going to the arcade. The same people who went to the arcade started buying the game consoles.

    Which brings us to today. Believe it or not folks, I actually know some people who are over 35 years old, and they might actually fool you into thinking they weren't wearing Depends. Most of them still like doing the things they did when they were in their late teens and early twenties, which includes gaming.

    Now, if the study had claimed that the average gaming age was 40 or 45, that would have been a little harder to swallow.
    • I actually know some people who are over 35 years old, and they might actually fool you into thinking they weren't wearing Depends.

      Now, if the study had claimed that the average gaming age was 40 or 45, that would have been a little harder to swallow.


      Why? Do people suddenly start wearing Depends at age 40 or 45?
  • by GoogolPlexPlex ( 412555 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:19PM (#4429298)
    When potion is consumed, 12 hit-dice of computer gamers are summoned in the area surrounding the consumer. Half of the summoned computer gamers will attack the enemies of the party of the consumer, half will form an opposing team and attack the other half (and the party itself). They will remain for 6 turns, until unsummoned, or until the supply of Mountain Dew runs out, whichever occurs first.
  • Maybe the age thing has to do with the fact that Nintendo used to be the most popular game system on the planet, when we were younger Mario was great, now that most have grown up, maybe they're into the more advanced type of games, or atleast the more mature games and that's why the PS2 is selling like crazy. Then again, Nintendo is selling the gamecube like hot cakes as well. I just can't get enough mario myself, as childish as it may seem, it's always a joy to play a new mario game, they're always insightful and intriguing on a more technical angle, especially the switch to 3d, that was amazing. and the newest is nothign short of amazing as well.

    Logik
  • I'm 32 now. Between my dad's Apple][ and the Atari 2600 and arcades, I've spent (wasted) approx 7 years total time playing a game of some sort.

    Fast forward to 2002. I'm now 32, still playing games, and now I can afford the hardware needed for most current games. GTA3 is my current obsession (and I know I'm not the only one).

    I actually had a kid working at Best Buy ask me if I was buying a game for their kid when I was perusing the game aisle. I've been gaming since he was still a dribble in his mom.

    Can't wait till my kids are old enough to play the hardcore stuff. Until then, it's GT3 on the PS2.

  • Gah! (Score:4, Funny)

    by EvilStein ( 414640 ) <.ten.pbp. .ta. .maps.> on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:35PM (#4429362)
    Some of them are still playing the same Nethack game they started in 79!

    The rest are probably wandering through the Zork anthology over and over and over..... hell, I've been lost in the Zork II maze since 1989.
  • by phorm ( 591458 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:36PM (#4429367) Journal
    1. One moment mom, I just have to save my game!
    2. I'll be there soon honey, I'm almost done
    3. Damnit Martha where are my spectacles? I can't see the crosshairs and I'm 4 frags behind.

    If I can find a game that's not a repeat-concept when I'm 40 I'll be very happy - phorm
  • Old Farts Rule! (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Dead_Smiley ( 49033 )
    I belong to a gaming clan. We just play for fun because most of us are older and don't have the time it takes to develope the skills.

    Our tag is =VIO= which stands for Victory Is Ours.

    The running joke for people who ask is that it stands for Viagra Is on Sale.

    You can visit us on: irc.Renegade-IRC.Net #vio

  • Have all those 35+ gamers start playing on the pain station, Im sure they'll quit gaming real fast, and the younger demographic will take over again :)
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:39PM (#4429379)
    People won't be complaining about the food, they'll be saying "This internet connection isn't any good"

    I remember when Quake 3 was all the rage.

  • by mtec ( 572168 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:46PM (#4429403)
    in our old folks homes get a loada the way we can press that call button!
  • by RestiffBard ( 110729 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:47PM (#4429407) Homepage
    a surprising number of drivers can be found in all age ranges. not surprising since cars have been around for almost a hundred years.
  • Statistics? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by lpret ( 570480 )
    I wonder if there have been any studies into the age of gamers (console and PC and any difference there may be). I also wonder if it is a bell curve-shaped age distribution -- meaning, if the average gamer is over 35, does that mean there are just as many gamers older than 35 than younger than 35? Or does it mean that the mean is somewhere between 25-30 and where is the mode(s)? I mean, it could be inverted, with emphasis on the 10-14 yr. olds, and another emphasis on 30-35 yr. olds. Anyways, just doing my statistics hw and trying to find some usefulness for it...
  • by YrWrstNtmr ( 564987 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @10:52PM (#4429432)
    the surprising statistic that a large potion of computer gamers are over 35.

    Interesstingly, a large portion of humans are over 35.
  • A previous study... (Score:2, Informative)

    by lpret ( 570480 )
    Here is a previous study that is much more interesting and factual, Alice in the Matrix [nickyee.com]. It's an interesting read with 330 responses that seems to affirm what the article had to say.
  • Correlation (Score:2, Funny)

    by taloobie ( 537189 )
    Could there be a correlation between high average gaming age and the Generation X financial problems refered to in an earlier topic today????

    There is for me. I got a bunch of .com jobs so I could support my addiction to gaming well into my 50s!
  • Vectrex, 1982. Do the math. Sigh.
    -russ
  • Run Logan, run! (Score:4, Informative)

    by kfg ( 145172 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @11:11PM (#4429517)
    Gee, who woulda thunk that *old* people might like playing games? It's unseemly I tell you. Next thing you know 35 year olds will expect to be *real* racing drivers, mercenaries, adventurers, golfers, fighter pilots and, ummmm. . . Tertroids.

    We have to put a stop to this. Kill 'em. Kill 'em at 30. Kill 'em all!

    Here's another hot newsflash from the blindingly obvious findings desk, your parents still " do it." Not only that, they "do it" more often, and *better,* than you do.

    KFG
  • Who's old? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by r_j_prahad ( 309298 ) <r_j_prahad AT hotmail DOT com> on Thursday October 10, 2002 @11:17PM (#4429550)
    With apologies to Alfred E. Newman...

    What, me old?

    By the way, I have a copy of Crowther and Woods' original Adventure on paper tape for the PDP-11/55, and I have got the Zork Trilogy on my Linux box.
  • by dochood ( 614876 ) on Thursday October 10, 2002 @11:27PM (#4429586)
    I started playing computer games at age 14 in 1980, on a TRS-80, then an Apple II. I started playing a fair bit (growing up in a town of 350 folks there isn't a lot to do, anyway), when my science teacher noticed something in me. He said, "You know, I'm not going to let you play on that thing anymore unless you learn to program it!" I asked, how am I going to do that? He responded by throwing the programming manual in my lap and said, "Here. Ask if you have any questions."

    That got me started down the path to my current career! I played a lot of games in HS, but I also wrote my own text based adventure game on an Apple II, and I even wrote a little "Star Wars" game on a Vic 20 that I borrowed from a neighbor kid over Christmas Break!

    I'm now a Software Engineer for a Government Contractor firm, working in some cool technologies. I still play games today (having moved up from Apple Panic and Castle Wolfenstein 1 to Serious Sam II), but I don't play as much as I used to, having a wife and two kids. I do let my kids play a little more than I probably should, but I'm hoping that the love of computers might get them interested in programming, too! Since we homeschool, I personally think they'd have a GREAT computer programming teacher!

    P.S. Thanks, Mr. B! (science teacher) Without you, I might still be a gamer, but I probably never would have become a programmer!
  • I'm not really surprised by this, given that gamers get older like everyone else but gaming doesn't get much less addictive (you just have less time for it). But it's important that the fact of there being a significant demographic of older gamers is acknowledged, especially by game developers. Older gamers tend to have different tastes, and the more developers realize what their audience is like the greater the chance they'll make games we'll enjoy even more.
  • Back in my day gamers were all young and we had to use our imaginations! Screens only had four pixels and the only colour we had was black. Then some upstart invented amber and it's been all downhill since then...
  • by Spencerian ( 465343 ) on Friday October 11, 2002 @01:29AM (#4430033) Homepage Journal
    ...just for the older gamer, like me.

    I'm 38, and I still enjoy most kinds of games. Least amused by D&D style games like Neverwinter Nights (great title, though). I still rock with FPS and easily kick the ass of most people my age. Been playing a long time, since the 70's and Mattel's handheld football, the Ataris, and even DEC terminals with Camel and Trek.

    Passing time with Diablo II still, getting into some Sims, been really fragging the shit out of some young-ums in Quake 3, and looking forward to showing young meat how to catch a lightsaber when Jedi Knight II comes out for Mac OS X in a couple of weeks.

    Yep, card carrying, Excellent Fragging Member of The Old Gamers Club: Where you are never too young to get your ass kicked.

    I sincerely plan to be old but still able to hang and beat my grandchildren at whatever marvels show up in the future. I was around during the dawn of the electronic gaming age, and my "Tron finger" is as snappy as ever.
  • Simple economics. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by jinx90277 ( 517785 ) on Friday October 11, 2002 @01:37AM (#4430052)
    It isn't any great mystery -- it's simple economics, plus demographics.

    Kids (say, up through early college) would like to play games, but don't have the disposable income.

    Younger adults (say, late college through late 20s) have disposable income, but they are spending their money on social pursuits, vacations, cars, gadgets, clothing, etc.

    But when they finally marry and start families, the center for entertainment switches to the home...and those $50 games are somewhat more affordable once you hold down a real job.

  • Aging? (Score:3, Funny)

    by grub ( 11606 ) <slashdot@grub.net> on Friday October 11, 2002 @08:25AM (#4431189) Homepage Journal

    Heck, I'll be 37 in December but I don't consider myself "aging".
    When I have the inkling to buy SimAdultDiapers or SimLawnBowling at the software storethen I'll consider myself "aging".

    Until then, I'll still stomp your arse in UT 2003, lad!

    Harumph!
  • by Da VinMan ( 7669 ) on Friday October 11, 2002 @12:35PM (#4432874)
    I wonder if, when we're all senior citizens and fragging away on each other with Quake XXXVI, and taunting each other with broadband audio and vidio feeds, if the kids will pass us by and scoff. Maybe they would says things like "What's wrong with those old farts?! Why do they play that crap when they could just talk to each other?"

    Perhaps there *is* hope for our species after all.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...