Left 4 Dead 2 Banned In Australia 215
An anonymous reader writes "According to Australia's Office of Film and Literature Classification, Left 4 Dead 2's content exceeds that allowable for an MA15+ rating. Any such game is rated as Refused Classification, effectively banning it. From the report: 'The game contains realistic, frenetic, and unrelenting violence which is inflicted upon "the Infected" who are living humans infected with a rabies-like virus that causes them to act violently. The player can choose from a variety of weapons including pistols, shotguns, machine guns, and sniper rifles. However, it is the use of the "melee" weapons such as the crowbar, axe, chainsaw and Samurai sword which inflict the most damage. These close-in attacks cause copious amounts of blood spray and splatter, decapitations and limb dismemberment as well as locational damage where contact is made to the enemy which may reveal skeletal bits and gore.'"
Good advertising (Score:4, Insightful)
I didn't know valve did such a good job of making a proper gorey zombie game.
Re: (Score:2)
Considering that so far he seems to despise "consolized" games even more than usual for him I would expect that.
Left4Dead1 had pretty much one of the worst UI's of any game I've ever played. Long tree style menus that randomly dumped me back to the beginning after applying changes, utter inability to fine tune individual settings, mandatory motion blur...
I'm just hoping that since L4d2 is closer to valve's in-house stuff rather than being bought basically halfway through it has a decent chance of sucking le
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget failing to release many of the promised updates to the $20 half-finished mod, then announcing that they'll be in the sequel.
Advertisement? (Score:5, Funny)
Seriously. Did they pay the ratings board to write that?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Advertisement? (Score:4, Funny)
Seriously. Did they pay the ratings board to write that?
Probably, so I should fight my newly grown strong will to buy it.
Fortunately I'm at work; at home I'd have bought it already.
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously. Did they pay the ratings board to write that?
That is not so unlikely, the Left4Dead community is not at all pleased with how Valve seems to be abandoning them, and have created a Left4Dead Boycott Group [steamcommunity.com] with over 40.000 members.
Even if they sell each l4d II game for only 40 dollars (instead of the usual 49) that represents 1.6 million dollars in lost sales.
So Valve has to generate more interest in the new title, and this is probably a part of that.
Re: (Score:2)
OMG, it sounds like that game rawks
What, are Australians pussies or something?
Guns vs. melee (Score:5, Funny)
That's odd, I think I'd rather be hit by a crowbar than blasted with a shotgun. Oh well, only one way to find out.
Re:Guns vs. melee (Score:4, Funny)
That's odd, I think I'd rather be hit by a crowbar than blasted with a shotgun. Oh well, only one way to find out.
Do you happen to live in Australia by chance?
Re: (Score:2)
If it's a construction worker or one of those "ultimate fight" martial artist, I think I'm fubarred either way, so perhaps I should let them shotgun blast my head off...
FWIW, a samurai sword is probably more lethal than a handgun at close range. Surgeons don't do very well at stitching the two halves of
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Heh (Score:4, Interesting)
" These close-in attacks cause copious amounts of blood spray and splatter, decapitations and limb dismemberment as well as locational damage where contact is made to the enemy which may reveal skeletal bits and gore."
Sounds like a pretty convincing advertisement for the game! Darn astroturfers....
Seriously, the game is sold on Steam. Will steam sell you the game and let you play online if you have an australian IP address? Do they have to block you from purchasing it or not?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
And as that search shows, they also sell copies for the 360, which is definitely not steam. Plus, something tells me that most game companies don't like pissing off an entire national gov't. Just a thought though.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Heh (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Is it actually illegal in Australia to sell a game which is unrated? That seems a bit excessive to me.
Re:Heh (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Time to leave.
How is it that some people seem to think the free market economy extends to what country you live in...? Such a bizarre thing to expect is a realistic proposition for most people.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Considering L4D is primarily a mutliplayer game, I think they do ;-)
Sounds great (Score:3, Funny)
As someone who enjoys the first L4D, this is a really great description of the next one. I'm looking forward to it based on this description alone.
Working for these companies (Score:2)
The game contains realistic, frenetic, and unrelenting violence which is inflicted upon "the Infected" who are living humans infected with a rabies-like virus that causes them to act violently.
It must be interesting to work in HR at this company.
Looks like.... (Score:5, Funny)
Looks like somebody high up in Austrialia is a wee-bit angry about not having any of the promised downloadable content of l4d...
Re: (Score:2)
...or got pwned one too many times in PvP.
Did I read this wrong? (Score:2, Funny)
For some reason I thought this was China. I guess I stopped reading after I saw the word Banned.
Re: (Score:2)
And... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:And... (Score:5, Insightful)
This is different than the evening news? I'm all for sex over violence and a happy world but honestly the stuff that happens in that description is up nightly on TV.My friend down in AU says he watched 28 days/weeks later, so how is this any different?
Well, don't take this as support of the ban, but there is a difference between totally passively watching violence (and simulated violence) and actively controlling simulated violence. Different bits of the brain get used, and I believe there's some evidence that both can negatively impact social development in children, with the latter having a measurably stronger impact. I'm not aware of any research showing that either adversely affects adult behavior when viewed as an adult.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Not disagreeing with anything you said but this is clearly not a game for kids, and is not marketed as such.
Hm? Of course not. I disagree with the ban. I just object to analogizing the impact of film and video games - they're different media that stimulate different parts of the brain. They are different and should be treated differently: Specifically, age limitations based on content should probably be slightly lower with film than games.
As I said, I'm not aware of any negative impact on adults, and even if there were I dislike the notion that the government should protect us from it. There's a long slippery s
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
By the way, you should be modded down for the "but its harmful to children" argument you just used. The average age of an australian gamer has been shown to be over 30 [kotaku.com.au]
We are not asking for games like this to be available to children, only that we can have a suitable rating for adults that wish to play games with adult content not intended for sale or consumption by chidren.
Re: (Score:2)
The GPs point was that in fact, there is a difference between TV violence which is watched passively, and video game violence where the viewer becomes an active participant. And he is correct.
Re: (Score:2)
Not suitable for 15 yr old boys? (Score:5, Informative)
Don't they have an 18+ rating for games in Australia?
Polls consistently show that the vast majority of gamers are adults.
Re:Not suitable for 15 yr old boys? (Score:5, Informative)
No we do not.
Re:Not suitable for 15 yr old boys? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Not suitable for 15 yr old boys? (Score:4, Funny)
Yes. Those of us that survive don't need to play violent games. We've lived it!
Re: (Score:2)
Hoopsnakes kill more people than dingos.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Redundant)
No, it was /b/'s favorite Australian, Josef Fritzl.
Fritzl is "Austrian", The same place as your Governor Schwarzenegger. Not Australia.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Not suitable for 15 yr old boys? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Most of everywhere is under an inane set of laws mostly pulled out of thin air.
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty much the entire world is under such laws. The only difference of which subset of laws are in any given country.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
so L4D 2, mhh, banned, who cares, plenty of other games to choose from.
So it's ok as long as they only ban unreasonably games you don't like, right?
"First they came for L4D2..."
Re: (Score:2)
No, it is really a balance thing. Game not so impressive and the censors concern about children's access to that content is, borderline, a difficult thing to judge. So potential risk versus gain, so possible harm to minors versus profits for one amongst thousands of other games, and look to be honest compare these two pages http://store.steampowered.com/app/500/ [steampowered.com] and http://www.amazon.com/Left-4-Dead-Pc/dp/B000PS4X7S [amazon.com], what is the major difference, that's right ratings advice, so valve is looking pretty guil
Re: (Score:2)
I don't understand you, so let's say you're right.
Nice retort!
Re:Not suitable for 15 yr old boys? (Score:4, Informative)
Nope, their rating system goes from G, PG, M, MA15+ (which is a mishmash of what we have as T and M in the ESRB though nearly all end up on the MA15+ side) and then RC games classified as RC are automatically banned from sale and display.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't they have an 18+ rating for games in Australia?
No, strangely enough, they actually don't [wikipedia.org]. Apparently, they have an 18+ rating, but it's not applicable to video games. Games that would receive such a rating are refused classification and banned from sale in the country. Which I find very stupid, given the number of games that aren't geared for kids and the average age of gamers is, what, 27 now?
Re: (Score:2)
Part of the reason may be that 18+ movies only get limited release because of the economics of that medium. As you point out most gamers are over 18 so the 18+ rating would not deter game developers and 18+ games would proliferate.
Re: (Score:2)
. As you point out most gamers are over 18 so the 18+ rating would not deter game developers and 18+ games would proliferate.
...And so, the market would determine what should be produced, instead of an arbitrary governor.
Where's the problem?
Re: (Score:2)
. As you point out most gamers are over 18 so the 18+ rating would not deter game developers and 18+ games would proliferate.
...And so, the market would determine what should be produced, instead of an arbitrary governor.
Where's the problem?
I agree with you.
Re: (Score:2)
Since when do 18+ movies only get limited release? There have been huge blockbuster movies with R ratings. They get shown everywhere.
Now it's also probably true that most R movies get a limited release, but that is due to the movie, not the rating.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I'd have to disagree. I'm sure there are many game developers who actually enjoy making content that is not necessarily violent or objectionable. Developers don't have to make gory content just because they can.
Re: (Score:2)
Introduction of such a rating would require consensus (and possibly unanimity) from the state's Attorney Generals. Atkinson, the AG from South Australia currently opposes this and is also refusing to allow publication of the results of public poinion on the matter.
Copies will be downloaded or imported just as they have for previous iterations of 'Refused Classification' games. Sure, kids who rely on their parents buying their games will probably be unable to get a hold of a copy - but that is already true o
Re: (Score:2)
Wait, so the Attorney Geeral isn't allowing publication of public opinion [polls] on the matter? (I'm assuming you meant to say that; what other public opinions could there be? Editorial-types, which are anecdotal? Nah, polls makes sense; they're the ones that represent more people.)
So, why does the attorney general have any say over what gets published by the Aussie media? What kind of backwards system is that, where the person having a hand making the law can also prevent public opinion from being display
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Not suitable for 15 yr old boys? (Score:5, Informative)
R18+ is not applicable to video games, which has been an ongoing complaint of the industry for a LONG time now.
So in the sense this isn't "banned" as such, it's just that the censors are given the game and told to work out the category.
Normally, anything so bad that it doesn't fit into the R18+ classification (which usually means stuff like "realistic depictions of rape" and varying gradients of behaviour heading towards but falling short of "child pornography") are the only things that end up beyond the available ratings and in the "Refused Classification" area.
The problem is just that they WOULD quite happily give it R18+, but they aren't allowed to. Which leaves violent games like this thrown in with rape video and similar stuff, where they don't belong.
Everyone knows it's fucking ridiculous, and as the game-playing public ages I imagine it will get fixed eventually. It just results in stupid edge cases in the short term.
Re: (Score:2)
Everyone knows it's fucking ridiculous, and as the game-playing public ages I imagine it will get fixed eventually. It just results in stupid edge cases in the short term.
Naive much? Lets look at history to see how well thats worked out for us:
1. Alcohol: At first anyone could drink. Then nobody could drink, then 16 year olds could drink, then 18, then 21. Note that you can vote and be drafted at 18 but still can't buy a beer. So no the edge case did not get fixed.
2.Marijuana: A native weed that has been cultivated in the US for over 400 years. Only in the past 60 years has there been prohibition (thanks refer madness). Growing 1 plant in most states will land you wit
Re: (Score:2)
> Give me one example where some government restriction or prohibition has been
> "fixed eventually". I can't think of any.
alcohol prohibition in the US...your constitutional amendments for it
Re:Not suitable for 15 yr old boys? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Not suitable for 15 yr old boys? (Score:5, Funny)
We're waiting for him to die.
Why wait? Get out your crowbars, axes, chainsaws and Samurai swords!
I'm sure you'll doubly enjoy to see his blood spray and splatter! If Martin Bryant was able do it, so can you!
We want to see Atkinson's head. On a platter. Along with his left arm and right leg!
Re: (Score:2)
We certainly are, I can't wait for his generation (and religion) to die out.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Don't they have an 18+ rating for games in Australia?
Polls consistently show that the vast majority of gamers are adults.
in connection with this... Just because a kid "shouldn't" play the game, nobody is allowed to? Ratings are for the parents, if i was a parent and wanted to get a 18+ classified game to my kid, who give the right to the government to stop me? No-one. They cannot buy the game themselves, but that's all. So, again, because some board of someones thinks that it is not suitable for children, who the hack are they to tell what is available for sale. Oh, right, the law.... And because it's about "just some game an
Re:Not suitable for 15 yr old boys? (Score:5, Informative)
"He doubts whether any safeguards could be put in place to deter young people, who after all (are) the most computer literate and savvy in our society, from being able to access material."
news.com.au [news.com.au]
Until he is replaced or retires, there will not be any change to the classification system.
Re: (Score:2)
"He doubts whether any safeguards could be put in place to deter young people, who after all (are) the most computer literate and savvy in our society, from being able to access material."
Well he's right, which is also the reason they will be able to evade his ban on the stuff in the first place. What an idiot, if you've got a moral objection just come out and say it you hypocrite.
Re: (Score:2)
No we don't. Thanks to one man by the name of Michael Atkinson. I thought we're supposed to be a democracy, but I guess not.
Re: (Score:2)
"We" really want the rating but our fatally flawed democracy wont allow it.
Every now and then we try but it never succeeds [smh.com.au]
In order to get the R rating we require the unanimous decision from our state governor generals, and the SA Governor General is an ultra conservative, and refuses every time. Can't get around it until he dies or they change the bureaucracy .
Re: (Score:2)
Australian politicians are still stuck in the mindset that "teh nintendoz" is for the kids. And that any adult that still plays games is some kind of deviant dole bludging waster who should go work three jobs and only sleep 4 hours a night like the PM.
Of course the lack of an R category has backfired in that the censors quite often mark games that got R rated in America as MA15+. Ironically if they allowed an R catergory kids would have less access to violent games.
I guess I will be firing up bittorrent or
Re: (Score:2)
Here on Ars Technica: age of the average gamer is 33 [slashdot.org]
It shouldn't surprise you terribly, as it's an expensive hobby
Re: (Score:2)
bah, copied the link from the wrong tab. This is the right one:
age of the average gamer is 33 [arstechnica.com]
Re: (Score:2)
What do they do if they have insomnia and can't sleep during the day? They play computer games in the basement.
Re: (Score:2)
Really? I always assumed that the average gamer was between 5 and 15. Can you back up your stats?
Numerous people seem to think so (pretty much wrong everywhere, as pointed out by numerous posts) which is why computer games have so many stupid laws passed (or people attempting to pass them) against them when (for example) books publishers can do pretty much what they want.
(ooh, a violent book got published, let's ban it so that 8 years old don't read it !, after all they read comics all day, clearly they're the biggest book reading demographic !)
I can see the headlines now. (Score:4, Interesting)
The game that was so good it was banned in Australia.
Wha... (Score:4, Funny)
Not that bad... (Score:3, Funny)
Hey, at least there's no nudity!
Re:Not that bad... (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
look up left4head theyve got smokers molesting zoey, hunters "raping" her, and defeat of a witch via lesbian acts.
here's an idea (Score:5, Interesting)
Valve's Zombie shooter has been refused classification, which means it can't be made commercially available in the country.
Valve should thumb their nose at Australia's rating board and make the game freely available there.
Re: (Score:2)
L4D2... (Score:2, Funny)
You do have to admit... (Score:2, Interesting)
Australian version: Theft of Bread (Score:2)
In other news, Valve just announced that the sequel to their game "Left for Dead" will have a special Australian version with localized content. The localized sequel, named "Theft of Bread", will have a horde of undead stealing bread, where the player equipped with appropriate tools is tasked with the mission to retrieve the bread the undead have stolen slice per slice. Valve has announced that the weaponry will include old-time classics such as the breadknife, the toaster and various kinds of jam. Players
This from the country that made Road Warrior! (Score:2)
I will never understand censorship.
Left 4 Dead 2 is bad for people, Road Warrior is good for people.
Australia, you have a wallaby in your dickhole. Crikey!
Censor that and put another shrimp on the bar-bee.
In all seriousness... Left 4 Dead 2 (a shitty expansion pack) and Road Warrior 2 are perfectly fine for entertainment. Stop the censorship. Chill out... and have a veggemite!
The message is clear (Score:3, Informative)
Aussies, if you want to see blood and gore spluttering from some zombie's guts, it's time to go to your parlament!
How you read that, well, that's up to you...
Re: (Score:2)
If you want to read it that way, well, I can't tell you how to interpret it.
What I of course meant was to write a letter to your congressman/senator/whatever the aussies have, or to talk to him in person if that's possible, that you're a voter and don't want to live in a nannystate...
Sinudeity (Score:2, Funny)
Meh (Score:3, Funny)
The "restoration" crack will be available approximately 30 seconds after release in Australia.
Banned at retail? (Score:2)
Re:yarr (Score:5, Insightful)
The silly thing is that when they ban a game, they increase the number of local torrenters, which increases availability to those under 18.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
"Crikey", doofus.
Re: (Score:2)
I 3 Threads
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm sorry you had to endure your wartime experience and believe you deserve respect for what you've endured.
It's possibly worth noting that the game in question is not a war game but I don't think that probably changes your core objection, which as I understand it is against making violence against humans (or human-looking things) and personal peril a recreational activity. I should note that, politically, I'm generally in favour of not banning things where reasonably possible. Why? Well, my core reasoni